Meta’s fact-checking partners claim they were “blindsided” by the company’s decision to abandon third-party fact checking on Facebook, Instagram and Threads in favor of a Community Notes model, and some say they are now scrambling to figure out if they can survive the hole this leaves in their funding.
“We heard the news just like everyone else,” says Alan Duke, co-founder and editor-in-chief of fact-checking site Lead Stories, which started working with Meta in 2019. “No advance notice.”
The news that Meta was no longer planning on using their services was announced in a blog post by chief global affairs officer Joel Kaplan on Tuesday morning and an accompanying video from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Instead, the company plans to rely on X-style Community Notes, which allow users to flag content that they think is inaccurate or requires further explanation.
Meta partners with dozens of fact-checking organizations and newsrooms across the globe, 10 of which are based in the US, where Meta’s new rules will first be applied.
“We were blindsided by this,” Jesse Stiller, the managing editor of Meta fact-checking partner Check Your Fact, tells WIRED. His organization started working with Meta in 2019 and they have 10 people working in the newsroom.“This was totally unexpected and out of left field for us. We weren’t aware this decision was being considered until Mark dropped the video overnight.”
The news organizations who had partnered with Meta to tackle the spread of disinformation on the platform from 2016 are scrambling to figure out how this change will impact them.
“We have no idea what the future looks like for the website going forward,” Stiller says.
Duke says Lead Stories had a diverse revenue stream and most of its operations were outside of the US, but claims the decision would still have an impact on them. “The most painful part of this is losing some very good experienced journalists, who will no longer be paid to research false claims found on Meta platforms,” Duke says.
For others the financial implications are even more dire. One editor at a US-based fact-checking organization that works with Metas, who was not authoritized to speak on the record, told WIRED that Meta’s decision “is going to eventually drain us out.”
Meta did not respond to a request to comment on its partners allegations or the financial impact its decision would have on some organizations.
“Meta didn’t owe fact checkers anything, but it knows that by pulling this partnership it’s removing a very significant source of funding for the ecosystem globally,” says Alexios Mantzarlis, who helped establish the first partnerships between fact-checkers and Facebook between 2015 and 2019 as director of the International Fact Checking Network. .
Meta’s partners were also angered by Zuckerberg’s allegation that fact checkers had become too biased.
According to Duke, it is disappointing to hear Mark Zuckerberg accuse the organizations in Meta’s US third-party fact-checking program of being “too politically biased”. “Let me fact check that. Lead Stories follows the highest standards of journalism and ethics required by the International Fact-Checking Network code of principles. We fact check without regard to where on the political spectrum a false claim originates.”
